
Theoretical Background
Strategic narratives function to justify (geo)political aims, forge international alliances, and shape public opinion in domestic and foreign audiences as well as creating new conflicts and polarisations of target audiences. History narratives are not strategic per se, but are made strategic by the context in which they occur. We focus on the history narratives spread in the messages by the Russian Federation’s strategic actors and important mediators and channels linked with these. It means that the project does not concentrate only on the states’ grand strategies, but considers it equally important how the debating of narratives around a state’s identity, its conception of order, and the policies it wishes to pursue shape which ideas become accepted.
Main research questions:
What are the main strategic goals of the Russian Federation’s strategic history narrativs’s towards domestic and foreign audiences and which actors are empowered and subordinated by the these narratives?
What are the cultural-mythological roots of the strategic history narratives and what kind of meaning making do they evoke?
How does the use of the Russian Federation’s transmedia strategy differ as regards the target audience and which counter-measures could be constructive in public diplomacy for mitigating its effect?